Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amy Ried (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –  Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 14:20, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

Amy Ried
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

A biography of a living person that lacks reliable sources that discuss it directly and in detail. Awards listed are not significant and well-known; the AVN awards are scene / group related. The article thus does not meet WP:PORNBIO.

The first AfD in 2007 closed as "keep" based on the awards, but PORNBIO has been significantly tightened since then and it's a good time to revisit. K.e.coffman (talk) 22:34, 6 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 22:35, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 09:43, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 09:43, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete. The claimed award is marginally significant at best, and referencing the article to low-grade sources like Fleshbot the "Qlimax Times:, and a batch of industry PR copy underscores just how badly this BLP fails GNG standards. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006.   (talk) 22:33, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete a non-notable actress.John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:59, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep - Note: I have recently edited the article under consideration here. The subject here has won "a well-known and significant industry award", namely the Fans of Adult Media and Entertainment Award (which has been basically comparable to the People's Choice Awards in the past) "Favorite Female Rookie", which is also similar to other well-known, major adult film award categories like the AVN Award for Best New Starlet & XBIZ Award for Best New Starlet. There is no restriction against fan-based awards under our inclusions guidelines, and all of the references currently used in this article here are reliable for what they are trying to cite. Guy1890 (talk) 05:51, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
 * You added three references to the article: a self-published book, the "Qlimax Times Online", and a duplicative cite to an awards announcement. How do any of these qualify as significant independent reliable coverage under BLP standards? Also, the comparison to the People's Choice Awards was cited to the award's own page, so that it counts for nothing, and has therefore been removed from the main article, The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006.   (talk) 17:10, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –  Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 02:00, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Nom's comment -- recent edits have been minor and have not addressed the notability concerns: diff. The article is still not suitable for inclusion at this time. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:24, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete as I concur, none of this substantiates notability and the WP:PORNSTAR standards apply. SwisterTwister   talk  02:58, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:54, 23 January 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.