Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amy Rivard


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America1000 03:55, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

Amy Rivard

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Advertorialized WP:BLP of a musician and actress, not reliably sourced as clearing either WP:NMUSIC or WP:NACTOR. Her primary notability claims as a musician are touring as a supporting chorus vocalist with a musical group whose article fails to mention her name at all because she was never an actual primary member of it, and releasing albums "which can be found on iTunes and Amazon" -- and her notability claim as an actress is that she's been in stuff. And for sourcing, this is referenced entirely to primary sources and IMDb, with zero evidence shown of any reliable source coverage about her in media. As always, the notability test is not the things the article says, but the depth and quality of the sources that can be shown to support the things it says -- but none of these sources are cutting it at all, and nothing stated in the article body is "inherently" notable enough to exempt the sources from having to cut it. Bearcat (talk) 19:44, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 19:44, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 19:44, 3 September 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete for now until properly sourced material published. Searches of "Amy Rivard music" result in only own links and social media pages. Earnsthearthrob (talk) 20:36, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - No coverage in independent reliable sources to establish notability.  The article reads like press release, and the claims for notability are rather weak. -- Whpq (talk) 22:20, 4 September 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.