Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amy Sonnie


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was speedy deleted (G7). TheProject 05:08, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

Amy Sonnie
Nominated for deletion by an IP, who can't complete the nomination. Listing now. No vote. Stifle (talk) 00:19, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
 * I think it should be deleted--it's remained a stub for a substantial amount of time and more info is available on Sonnie's work in other entries anyhow. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.7.198.136 (talk • contribs)
 * I'd say keep. According to the CSD tag which Stifle rightly removed, the subject of the article has requested its removal... but I don't see a real reason for that, nor is AfD/CSD the place to decide that. She is the editor of a well known and presumably well-sold anthology, a cursory glance at Google suggests she's been written about by reliable sources, which is essential to a biographical article. No compelling reason to delete pops out. --W.marsh 00:29, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
 * To ammend that a little bit, I wouldn't object to a merge/redirect to the anthology's article. --W.marsh 00:42, 11 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Weak delete One and only published book is an anthology she edited with an Amazon rank of #609,233. Other than that, no sources or claims of notability. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  00:40, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep or merge. Tyrenius 01:57, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete not particularly notable.ßlηguγΣη | Have your say!!! - review me 02:48, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Er How come the article has vanished? Tyrenius 04:48, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
 * The author requested deletion, according to the deletion logs. TheProject 05:08, 11 May 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.