Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amy Soranno


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Consensus reached is that the article passes WP:GNG. (non-admin closure) Curbon7 (talk) 05:16, 12 September 2021 (UTC)

Amy Soranno

 * – ( View AfD View log )

The subject of this article, Amy Soranno, is not notable. The vast majority of the sources discussing this person are linked to a single event: a single instance of a series of "Meat the Victims" protests that the subject, along with many other people, was involved in. It seems that even the worldwide collection of "Meat the Victims" protests as a whole does not have its own article, and even if it did, the single instance would not, on its own, be noteworthy, as it seems to have only generated national news articles in Canada for about one day. Her activism seems generally common and un-notable, and there is no indication that she's engaged in activism of any kind since this Meat the Victims thing besides chaining herself to the front doors of her local bank. Another section describes Amy's purported illnesses, one of which is pseudoscientific nonsense, and none of which are unusual enough to earn her an article. The remaining section describes Amy's career as a "teen beauty queen", which, from the article, seems to have culminated in her participation in a local carnival's beauty pageant. MichaelKossin (talk) 01:19, 20 August 2021 (UTC)

— MichaelKossin (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 02:51, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of British Columbia-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 02:17, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 02:18, 20 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep. Her activism spans multiple years with many separate events, and the announcement of the upcoming jury trial was covered by a number of media outlets. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 02:48, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Her other activism has not been notable enough to warrant coverage from reliable sources, and the upcoming trial is again part of the single arguably-notable event the subject is tied to. Notability_(people)  --MichaelKossin (talk) 23:21, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:02, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Beauty pageants-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:02, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Notified and, who are the creator and major contributor respectively, and were not notified by the nominator. Jumpytoo Talk 03:10, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep per WP:GNG. Rob (talk) 12:15, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Less Unless (talk) 09:06, 28 August 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep it looks like there's sustained coverage over a couple of years. It doesn't really matter how unique or noteworthy her activism seems to individual editors. BuySomeApples (talk) 23:34, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Most of the sources seem hyper-local and cover her getting lyme disease or being in a beauty pageant. The rest are about stuff that happened when she was present at the event. Nothing terribly notable. Oaktree b (talk) 03:31, 29 August 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 09:32, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep - there seems to be enough coverage about article's subject to me. Even though many sources are linked to the mentioned event, there also seems to be enough coverage from before to testify WP:GNG criteria, and WP:1E does not need to be accounted for.-- Melaleuca alternifolia  |  talk  17:42, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep - many of the sources are indeed local to the Okanagan Lake area, User:Oaktree, but some are national, and there's also local coverage that could be found in Abbotsford publications - 500 kilometres away, that could have been used to cover events in Abbotsford. There's also some national coverage already sourced in the article. Searching wider, there's coverage in major papers like the Vancouver Sun. Nfitz (talk) 01:41, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep Passes GNG per all above.4meter4 (talk) 21:21, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep, a wide range of coverage overall.Jackattack1597 (talk) 21:29, 11 September 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.