Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amyt Datta


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. (WP:NPASR). (non-admin closure) NorthAmerica1000 14:29, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

Amyt Datta

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Flunks on WP:BAND. Article fails to explain why the subject is notable or worths an encyclopedic article. Ocean of flippant, frivolous and trivial references with external links which are not enough to establish any sort of notability. Current state of the article comes no near to the General notability guideline at Wikipedia. Hitro  talk  17:47, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 19:47, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 19:47, 30 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Northamerica1000(talk) 12:32, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 11:54, 20 February 2014 (UTC)




 * Keep - Notability standards like Gold charts as seen in the notability criterion does not apply to India as it doesn't have one. Upon some googling, artist seems to have a fair share of albums and is definitely worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Diwan07 (talk • contribs) 18:51, 21 February 2014
 * Fails on WP:BAND, if you think he doesn't then explain it why and with some sources. I have nominated him after googling. References are frivolous that is one of the reasons for this nomination. Hitro   talk  18:36, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.