Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anónimo Consejo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Nomination Withdrawn as per below. UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 14:46, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

Anónimo Consejo

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Does not appear to be a notable band, all of the sources are to facts about the genre, not the artists. Would also take a total rewrite to make it neutral and encyclopedicly toned.  S ven M anguard  Wha?  20:29, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cuba-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 23:12, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 23:12, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Keep i clicked yonder · books · link in yonder template. 86.44.31.213 (talk) 02:49, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment. Keep or Delete, the existing article is almost totally unsuitable - the tone is very much non-neutral. But that's an editorial issue, not one of deletion. As for the sources - I'm not sure there's enough to justify keeping. UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 13:07, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
 * I have completely rewritten the article (the edit tab was open for over 3 hours) and will notify the editors who have already commented here. With many significant mentions all over the web (click "books" above), I believe this passes GNG pretty easily in its current form.  Nolelover   Talk · Contribs  00:37, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep, BTW.  Nolelover   Talk · Contribs  00:46, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep everything look like it is in order since it was fixed --Guerillero &#124; My Talk  00:55, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Withdrawn I didn't think what you just did was possible. Well done Nolelover.  S ven M anguard   Wha?  14:29, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks :)  Nolelover   Talk · Contribs  14:33, 6 January 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.