Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/An Bord Pleanála and the Corrib gas project


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 11:12, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

Kevin Moore (An Bord Pleanála)
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Page created purely for sopaboxing purposes G  ain  Line    ♠  ♥ 08:33, 5 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Comment, if its for "soapboxing" then I suggest WP:FIXIT not delete it. What is the rationale behind deletion, is it based on notability, unreliable sources etc? I remain unconvinced because I dont hear a reason to actually delete it.--

Vintagekits (talk) 10:08, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Again as per reasons for nominating Pat O'Donnell. Recommended by mediator atWikipedia talk:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2009-05-6/Corrib Gas. This article was prodded originally but article was moved and renamed to remove prod.  G  ain  Line    ♠  ♥ 11:04, 5 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete Almost entirely comprised of one extended quote from a recommendation of a stsff member to a tribunal -- which now happens to set the record for unreadability with a Gunning Fog index of 22.4 (the previous high I found was 17.08) -- a one ref article essentially which is not readable to boot. The premise is that a staffer's opinions which were not followed by a tribunal thus connect the tribunal to the subject of the report.  In point of fact, amazingly, many reports by staff are not used by agencies or tribunals, and that is why the person making the report is "staff" and not part of the tribunal. The connection of the tribunal with the project it ruled on is SYN in and of itself.  Collect (talk) 10:19, 5 June 2009 (UTC)  Title of article is An Bord Pleanála and the Corrib gas project at time of comments. Collect (talk) 10:20, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Apologies, Article was moved and renamed to remove a Prod, made it very difficult to set up AFD correctly G  ain  Line    ♠  ♥ 11:07, 5 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions.  — G  ain  Line    ♠  ♥ 12:19, 5 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete as per nom. Snappy (talk) 12:22, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge somewhere. This is essentially an article about one news event (the report); it belongs somewhere else. Hairhorn (talk) 13:02, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Niteshift36 (talk) 06:37, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment I created this article, but I would have no objection to its deletion provided the content is merged. Lapsed Pacifist (talk) 11:10, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - non-notable, seemingly created as part of the ongoing Shell to Sea campaign being fought across Wikipedia. Canterbury Tail   talk  12:59, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --Kuzaar-T-C- 12:29, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.