Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/An Egg Scramble


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Looney_Tunes_Golden_Collection:_Volume_3. (non-admin closure) Steven Zhang  The clock is ticking....  00:05, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

An Egg Scramble

 * – ( View AfD View log )

No reliable sources, consists almost entirely of plot summary and of questionable notability. JDDJS (talk) 22:29, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 23:04, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 23:04, 7 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Redirect to List of Warner Bros. cartoons with Blue Ribbon reissues Looney Tunes Golden Collection: Volume 3. This was the Warner Bros cartoon that first introduced the character of Prissy Hen. While wide review for a 7-minute cartoon short from 61 years ago will be unlikely, the cartoon itself can be sourced to reliable sources and multiple books. A redirect of a likely search term serves the project.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 03:28, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
 * I think a redirect is a good idea. I would've done that from the start, but I didn't think there was anything to redirect it too. JDDJS (talk) 03:31, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Changing my mind slightly. While a redirect to a list is worth considering, I now think a redirect to Looney Tunes Golden Collection: Volume 3 is where a reader can find contextual and sourced content about this short and others, and as a redirect target better serves to increase their understanding of the topic in a manner that the Warner Bros list target would not.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 17:51, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
 * That seems to be good to me. JDDJS (talk) 17:55, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Redirect as above. Stuartyeates (talk) 09:58, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.