Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/An Excellent Picture of Yolanda (2007 film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 08:12, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

An Excellent Picture of Yolanda (2007 film)
I am proposing this article for AfD because it is an example of the dangers of crystalballism: the information available on the internet for a proposed 2007 Woody Allen film does not, in large part, match the information to be found here. Some of the information in this article originally matched a film to be released this summer by Woody Allen, entitled Scoop (that information, I must note, has since been removed; but its original presence in the article gives the impression of very poor research on the part of the author). A good deal of the rest of it, including the title, cannot be verified, since no references are to be found in the article. A search for the title brings 0 ghits. Charles 02:15, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Totally unverifable and crystall-ballish. Let's face it, the guy is so secretive about his projects that a huge percentage of the rumors circulating about them are based on lies and misdirection that he deliberately spread. When it comes to a Woody Allen movie, you really have to wait almost for the release to even have a reliable title. Fan-1967 02:40, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as an unverifiable picture of a crystal ball. --Core des at talk. o.o;; 04:48, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Zero ghits? Possible hoax. Gummy bears inside my crystal ball. SynergeticMaggot 07:01, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per Charles. Gwernol 11:42, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete is this a spoof? Just zis Guy you know? 11:59, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom.-(chubbstar) — talk
 * Delete If it indeed is true, add it then. Until then, nope. R.E. Freak 02:46, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Once WP:V is possible, recreation or deletion review may be pursued. --Dhartung | Talk 06:52, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as unverifiable crystalball predictions. It has no place on Wikipedia. TedTalk/Contributions 05:17, 23 July 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.