Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/An Original Man (A Song for Keith)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. The fact that the song was dedicated to Keith Relf has been merged to Birdland (album). --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:10, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

An Original Man (A Song for Keith)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Stub with no chance at being a full article. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 21:57, 11 March 2009 (UTC) 
 * Delete or redirect to album, per WP:NSONGS. JohnCD (talk) 23:06, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as a non-plausible search term, fails notability per WP:MUSIC.   Esradekan Gibb    "Talk" 03:49, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 00:07, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge with Birdland (album). twirligig T tothe C 01:36, 16 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Merge / Redirect - It's a song with notability on several grounds, but not enough for it's own article. It would be nice to know why it was dedicated to whom it was, but even that would not be enough to merit it's own article. Proxy User (talk) 05:14, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: non-notable non-charting song. JamesBurns (talk) 03:50, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - no evidence of notability. TheClashFan (talk) 01:05, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: fails notability WP:NSONGS. A-Kartoffel (talk) 00:35, 19 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.