Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/An Untouched Paradise Shaxi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. Article now moved to Shaxi, Taicang.   A rbitrarily 0   ( talk ) 02:16, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

An Untouched Paradise Shaxi

 * – ( View AfD View log )

unreferenced puffery, with POV title. Two shaxi articles already exist, this article is likely a duplicate of one of those. Gaijin42 (talk) 15:05, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 16:47, 1 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep - This article is a shambles for multiple reasons. Firstly, the title fails our neutral point of view policy.  The article seems to be a mashup describing more than one town with the name of Shaxi.  With the understanding that Wikipedia is not a reliable source, our article on Taicang, Jiangsu Province support the idea that there is a town of Shaxi that is different from the other two Shaxi articles we have.  But after the article was tagged for deletion, more information and soruces were added but that all seems to come from the town web site for Shaxi, Zhongshan which is not in Jiangsu, but rather Guangdong Province.  Sources like  would seem to support the notion of a town of Shaxi separate from those listed at Shaxi.  This article does need a lot of work however, and renaming to Shaxi, Taicang would be the first thing that needs to happen. -- Whpq (talk) 17:38, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 00:28, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, v/r - TP 16:22, 15 November 2011 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.