Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/An elegant theory of time


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 00:50, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

An elegant theory of time

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Contested PROD - No reliable sources, cannot be verified independently, reads like an Advertisement MLauba (talk) 18:22, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete in an elegant and timely fashion. This doesn't even appear to be a book, but rather a website, aneleganttheoryoftime.com from an author whose theory appears to be "been there, done that". Mandsford (talk) 18:40, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. No actual content - just advertising puffery. &mdash; RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 19:04, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as an apparent promotion. WillOakland (talk) 19:09, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete not even an advertisement; there's no product being sold there. Just a kook with a website. eaolson (talk) 19:19, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable nonsense. Cardamon (talk) 03:19, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Underneath the gibberish is a novel idea, but sadly, Wikipedia does not publish original research. Bearian (talk) 18:54, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per pretty much everything said.Headbomb {{{sup|ταλκ}}κοντριβς – WP Physics} 06:03, 8 April 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.