Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/An introduction to BLAST - Basic Local Alignment Search Tool


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Denelson83 07:14, 17 November 2005 (UTC)

An introduction to BLAST - Basic Local Alignment Search Tool
Nothing useful here that isn't already covered in BLAST. howcheng  [ t &#149; c &#149; w &#149;  e  ] 00:13, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. I particularly like the taunting at the end of the article, practically begging someone to delete it. Turnstep 01:55, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
 * LOL! That wasn't there when I put in the nomination! -- howcheng  [ t &#149; c &#149; w &#149;  e  ] 06:25, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Substandard article. But not sure that BLAST doesn't deserve a better article someday... can't figure out what BLAST is but the NCBI which I guess is part of NIH does have an entry on it...
 * Delete Almost feel bad voting to delete. When someone begs..I dunno just hard to not take pity on them lol:-D Knowledge Of Self  |  talk . 04:10, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete BLAST rocks, but this article is unnecessary. Jasmol 04:18, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Wikipedia is not a usage guide, tutorial or glossary. Title fails to follow naming conventions too. Everything is covered in the external links of BLAST. - Mgm|(talk) 14:39, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, WP is not a tutorial, though a few tidbits could be merged into BLAST. HGB 11:50, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep should have had "wikify" and "cleanup" tags, rather than deletion. I cleaned it up there so it should be okay to keep it now.  203.122.218.47 16:10, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Sorry, didn't notice the BLAST article. My bad. 203.122.218.47 16:47, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. *drew 12:32, 16 November 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.