Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ana Fani Alessandri Carlos


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 05:20, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

Ana Fani Alessandri Carlos

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Fails to meet Wikipedia's notability criteria, especially The person has made a widely recognized contribution that is part of the enduring historical record in his or her specific field. In my view, it is merely another professional, doing her job, like countless others around the world who do not have an article about them in any encyclopaedia. RafaAzevedo msg 11:21, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  —David Eppstein (talk) 16:48, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. Meets WP:PROF criterion #1 (significant impact in scholarly discipline, broadly construed). Citation impact indicates notability. See also this Google Books search. Additionally, one book in its 7th edition, suggesting that the subject possibly meets criterion #4 (significant impact in the area of higher education, affecting a substantial number of academic institutions) as well.--Eric Yurken (talk) 02:30, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep, in addition to the material shown above, there also seems to be some reasonable news coverage of this person. I can't read French or Portugese, but I think it all adds up to notability.  Lankiveil (speak to me) 04:02, 23 May 2009 (UTC).
 * Delete. May be suitable for Portugese Wiki. Xxanthippe (talk) 02:52, 24 May 2009 (UTC).
 * Comment. The English WP is the main/global WP, so notability should be verifiable through international sources, ideally sources that are widely available to the participants in AfD discussions. The language of those sources, however, certainly does not have to be English.--Eric Yurken (talk) 16:07, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 17:07, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Keep here, with a Portugese version over on the appropriate Wiki.   Echoing the arguments that Lankiveil gave. -- Dennis The Tiger   (Rawr and stuff) 19:09, 27 May 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.