Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ana Tzarev


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Tone 15:13, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

Ana Tzarev

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

non-notable artist, only assertion of notability is that she borrowed money to open an art gallery Wuh  Wuz  Dat  15:09, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete No evidence this meets WP:BIO  Triplestop  x3  15:24, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Favonian (talk) 15:29, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. I don't see how this one could have passed A7, but an admin declined it and I'll defer to his judgment. Recommending deletion due to inclement weather. Borrowing some money from her son to open a gallery does not notability make. Tim Song (talk) 16:36, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: She borrowed money from her son and opened a gallery and that's it. Fails WP:BIO. Joe Chill (talk) 19:54, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep: There are well more than three articles from noteworthy publications about her, listed in citations. That's pretty black-on-white. User:JeopardyOwner —Preceding undated comment added 03:34, 17 August 2009 (UTC). — Jeopardyowner (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Comment as CSD declining admin: I declined this on shady grounds - the article in and of itself fails dismally at A7; however, the references from reliable sources suggested there could be more to the story, so I declined almost against policy (the "err on the side of inclusion" rule). But the author has so far declined to add anything more to the article, and the sources on a fuller reading suggest that this is because there is no more to the story, it's simply a couple of meejatypes rewriting a press release. ➲ REDVERS It sucks to be me 18:56, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.