Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anadi Mishra


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 15:24, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

Anadi Mishra

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

paid for spam sourced to black hat seo fake news outlets, no meaningful in depth coverage in actual reliable sources. Praxidicae (talk) 13:37, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Coverage looks like press releases (poorly written ones, at that). OhNo itsJamie Talk 14:50, 28 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete — we need in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources independent of subject & if all the aforementioned boxes are not ✅ then subject of article doesn’t satisfy our general notability guidelines. It’s as simple as that.Celestina007 (talk) 15:30, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:42, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:43, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:43, 28 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete per nomination amplified by What's wrong with undisclosed paid editing| ☆ Bri (talk) 04:17, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment I am not an expert on hindu music or the art scene in India. However some of the articles that come up on the Google search appear to be reputable. Philphleg (talk) 10:53, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
 * I don't consider myself to be an expert on hindu music, but I do consider myself somewhat of an expert at least as far as WP goes with black hat SEO sources trying to pass themselves off as legitimate media outlets. My search reveals 0 sources that fall into the "independent, reliable" category. Praxidicae (talk) 15:10, 29 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. - Hatchens (talk) 15:17, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per all of the above Spiderone  12:07, 5 May 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.