Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Analı kızlı soup


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Consensus to keep following relisting. The Bushranger One ping only 04:31, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

Analı kızlı soup

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

WP:NOTHOW. Simple as that. "Instruction manuals. While Wikipedia has descriptions of people, places and things, an article should not read like a "how-to" style owner's manual, advice column (legal, medical or otherwise) or suggestion box. This includes tutorials, instruction manuals, game guides, and recipes. " (emphasis added) Gtwfan52 (talk) 21:29, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment Having what a dish is made of is not a recipe - that would be something like "add x amount of y", "cook for z minutes", etc. While WP:N may not be satisfied here (trying to find a specific guideline/essay for food and drink right now...), your nomination rationale is completely incorrect. Ansh666 22:18, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
 * I'll say weak keep - Google can find stuff (to prove it exists), and a quick perusal of related pages says that besides the grammar it's at a food stub level. Ansh666 22:34, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:49, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:49, 1 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep - The nomination is for deletion based on the article being a recipe. It is absolutely not a recipe.  One cannot reasonable expect an article about a prepared food item to not mention the main ingredients that constitute the dish.  There are no instructions in the article indicating proportions of ingredients, preparations steps, etc. that would represent an actual recipe.  Could one write a reasonable article on apple pie without mentioning apples?  -- Whpq (talk) 15:43, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 15:32, 8 August 2013 (UTC)




 * Keep Reasonable claim to notability. It would be better to have more than one source. Kitfoxxe (talk) 19:25, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep - because it isn't a recipe Fbryce (talk) 20:53, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.