Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anal Gestapo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Beeblebrox (talk) 21:22, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

Anal Gestapo

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article about a cover band which does not satisfy WP:GNG with lack of coverage by third party reliable sources. Since they are a tribute/cover band they lack any songs of their own and make it difficult for them to meet any criteria of WP:Band except for the ones already covered in WP:GNG. - McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 21:04, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. - McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 21:05, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Serbia-related deletion discussions. - McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 21:05, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. - McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 21:06, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

In Serbia, music press does not exists, so I can not present this kind of evidence of importance to Wikipedia. However, check Youtube and their videos, and number of people at concerts. Last, Wikipedia has number of tribute band articles, and I see no reason not to include this one.Rockunion (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 21:20, 10 May 2015 (UTC) Online articles about Anal Gestapo
 * http://ck13.org/141
 * http://www.komandantadam.com/2006.htm
 * http://blog.dnevnik.hr/muskat/2007/12/1623772968/live-report-ili-kako-sam-doiveo-i-preiveo-koncert.html

Rockunion (talk)
 * No view on notability, but this group sounds like a bunch of Nazi assholes. Newyorkbrad (talk) 02:03, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. Holy f%ck that was an unpleasant google search. I'm stll not sure if they're nazi assholes or flamboyant trolls. Not sure I want to know. Earflaps (talk) 03:20, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Both "nazi assholes" and "flamboyant trolls" sound very pejorative and offensive. Is it expected to tolerate this language on Wikipedia? Rockunion (talk)
 * "N.a." is a pun based on the name of the group. Newyorkbrad (talk) 14:18, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Neither nazi or asshole is a curse word, and I fail to see how 'flamboyant troll' is in any way pejorative (frequently being one myself, though I keep my trolling off wiki). But even if they are an All Leather type snark/shock band, doesn't change the fact that they have basically no coverage in english. Earflaps (talk) 17:10, 11 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Turbonegro, Turbojugend, Anal Gestapo, and everything associated with Turbonegro is *very anti-fascist oriented*. Check Turbonegro for more info. Do not make wrong conclusions before digging more deep. Rockunion (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 12:34, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
 * btw, noticed now you contributed heavily to teh article - however the discussion goes, you want want to make sure your research doesn't go to waste by transferring some of it to Turbonegro, if you built a 'cover bands' or 'legacy' section lower on the page (example) Earflaps (talk) 17:28, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
 * There is already a link at Turbonegro page to Anal Gestapo page. But I do not think we should be putting more information there. Rockunion (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 01:07, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
 * I'd say Delete as well, for the same reasons that McMatter gave. Three web-pages in Serbian are hardly enough for “coverage by reliable third party sources” (two of them look like they are simply billing calendars). And explaining a lack of sources by saying there is no music press in Serbia (ie there's no-one interested enough to write that kind of stuff, or else there's no-one interested enough to read it) is a circular sort of argument.
 * Also, this is (it would appear) a Serbian tribute band covering stuff by a Norwegian outfit; why then is the article on the English WP? The logical place would be the Serbian, or maybe the Norwegian, WP. And there is a music press in the English-speaking world; if this lot had any notability for an English-speaking readership then there would be some coverage, somewhere.
 * I would suggest, regardless of how this AfD goes, it would make more sense re-writing it in Serbian (or Norwegian, or both) and posting it on the relevant WP. Swanny18 (talk) 22:23, 13 May 2015 (UTC)


 * The page is in English, so it can be read by other Turbojugend members who mostly communicate in English. Not many understand Serbian nor Norwegian, and having an article in English seems adequate.
 * I am not trying to prove this entry is crucial for Wikipedia or the World in general, how could I? But it will matter to Turbojugend members or people interested in this kind of music. This could be a minority in the World, but if minorities should not be represented in Wikipedia, then Wikipedia should only write about Justin Bieber.
 * I am not an advocate, the links I provided above were first few links that came out in my search. Rockunion (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 19:56, 14 May 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.