Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anal Sex in Brasil


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Deleted. Zscout370 (Sound Off) 03:10, 3 September 2005 (UTC)

Anal Sex in Brasil
Not quite nonsense, but close; I don't see how this can become a worthwhile article. --jpgordon&#8711;&#8710;&#8711;&#8710; 04:22, 26 August 2005 (UTC)

Keep. I am just pointing out (no-one else has) that anal sex is pretty much considered totally normal and done a lot in Brasil much more so than in places like Argentina and the U.S. You should try it sometime. We even say in Brasil that if you dont do anal on the first date you are doing something wrong thank you Obrigado!Wiki brah 04:50, 26 August 2005 (UTC)


 * Merge with Anal sex. --Apostrophe 04:57, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge per Apostrophe. Nateji77 05:11, 26 August 2005 (UTC)


 * Merge; with Anal sex. - and we appreciate the effort but it's a bit too specific to really be practical in an encyclopedia of this proporion. I would also like some documentation of some sort as the article seems to be based on the authors subjective opinion. | Celcius 05:11, 26 August 2005 (UTC)


 * Abstain: Is such an entry going to open a pandora’s box for “similar entries? --Bhadani 05:18, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
 * I find the term "opening Pandora's box" a bit inappropriate in this context ;) Aecis 09:19, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
 * I do agree. --Bhadani 09:25, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - Sounds very POV. I'd like to see it backed up with some supporting evidence.  Wait, that didn't sound right... -PlainSight 05:21, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete and do not redirect unless sourced. Zoe 05:35, August 26, 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge. There's not much that's factual or verifiable here, thank God. There may be some valid points about relative prevalence of different sexual practices in different places, but without references it doesn't belong here. Trollderella 06:44, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
 * I have book sources for this statement plus my own personal experiences growing up in São Paolo and besides i think the girls in Rio do it more than here even thank you
 * Delete not backed up with anything. LOOK AT THIS USER'S CONTRIBUTIONS -- a lot of nonsense. unsigned hysteriacalism by User:Paul_Klenk
 * Strong delete. Verifiability is a necessity in this and similar cases, "own personal experiences" simply isn't good enough. I don't want to see a number of articles on sexual practices in different parts of the world based purely on personal experiences. If the statements can be sourced, they could possibly be merged somewhere - if they are not, they should just go. / Alarm 08:16, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge to Anal sex or delete if not verified. This is too granular for a seperate entry. - Mgm|(talk) 09:37, August 26, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, for various reasons noted above. --Bhadani 09:45, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as unverified. Uppland 10:13, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete and send author to Siberia for six years. I do not agree with the suggestion to merge with Anal Sex as this page has zero content to contribute to that page. Contains several unverifiable gems
 * The percentage of Brazilian women practicing anal sex is much higher than the United States. Who says and how can you verify this ?
 * "While this is all good fun" is not the tone of an encyclopedia.
 * Hetrosexual spread AIDS is much higher in Brazil than in Argentina. How do you know it's because of anal sex ? Manik Raina 11:51, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Nothing here, and, practically speaking, nothing ever will nor should. I'd call it "original research", except that there's no research. --Calton | Talk 12:44, August 26, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete and book flight to Brazil. Proto t c 14:21, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete and do not merge. Merge implies redirect. If someone believes that the topic is not adequately covered in the main article, go edit that article. But don't leave this page.  -- DS1953 14:44, August 26, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per Proto, uh sorry DS. Dottore So 18:15, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete unless references are added. Thue | talk 18:17, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete and nuke Brasil. They will suffer the same fate as Sodom!!! No worthwhile content addition, highly unencyclopedic, unverifiable, 'nuff said. -Hmib 18:41, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete with prejudice. "Granular," that's the word I was looking for.  Thanks, MGM.    Paul Klenk 21:54, 26 August 2005 (UTC) Pls. note that Klenk has voted twice for some reason thank you.Wiki brah 04:11, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment: Noted. Have you also noted that many people have asked you nicely to take more care creating articles, stub categories, and I'd add anything else? No change of vote (below). Andrewa 18:22, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Original research/unverifiable. --Carnildo 22:01, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete for reasons above. Groeck 06:31, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. No merge. Gamaliel 09:17, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, original research. Nandesuka 22:41, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete with no merge as something between original research and patent nonsense. ESkog 22:52, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. POV. *drew 22:59, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as banal analysis. Dpbsmith (talk) 00:31, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - there's nothing that could be merged as there is nothing cited by references as being factual. Rossrs 14:52, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete lack of referemnces DV8 2XL 16:26, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Short unattributed essay, no useful content. Misspelled name despite several users discussing this issue with the creator regarding previous articles (also up for deletion). The creator has been the subject of a great deal of comment in various places, generally good natured and assuming good faith so far, but we are close to having a more confrontational discussion IMO. Andrewa 17:57, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete pending references. This is a known phenominon, that anal sex is somewhat more widely practiced in Brazil than elsewhere in latin america. And it has lead to slightly higher rates of m2f HIV transmition. Klonimus 20:24, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete Not verified, very POV, and pointless. I do not suggest merging.
 * Speedy Delete via IAR - This ought to be a CSD. Speedy delete and use IAR as an excuse in the ensuing RFAr. Seriously though, think about it. How the hell is this encyclopedic? -- Phroziac  ( talk ) 03:08, September 3, 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.