Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anal pope


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete. --Joann e B 19:15, 26 November 2005 (UTC)

Anal pope
Tagged as a vanity article, with the implication of nn-bio. But it's a band, and we're too scared to speedy them. So here we are. -Splash talk 04:05, 20 November 2005 (UTC)


 * delete. It is very clearly not encyclopedia material. It isn't even clear anyone other than the author has heard of this band. Wikipedia is not an advertising medium. --Pmetzger 04:10, 20 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per all above. Another case where an nn-band tag would do just fine. PJM 04:56, 20 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom --VileRage ( Talk | Cont ) 07:49, 20 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Lulu of the Lotus-Eaters 08:20, 20 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. We need a speedy tag for things like this doktorb 08:54, 20 November 2005 (UTC)
 * DeleteAdvertising or hoax, not at all encyclopedic.-- Dak ota     t     e   09:10, 20 November 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.