Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anal queen


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 08:57, 25 December 2006 (UTC)

Anal queen

 * — (View AfD)

Not sure, but I think this would count as a neologism. 708 unique hits, albeit inculding a film title but likely not one warranting inclusion in Wikipedia. CanadianCaesar Et tu, Brute? 19:01, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:NEO and I don't feel that any of the reviews provided in the article are made from notable sources.  Michaelas10   (Talk)   20:10, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete I gotta go with a neologism, and obsucure enough I dont think it is adding value to wikipedia. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 20:14, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per all of the above. Valrith 21:08, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - per WP:NEO and the article doesn't really offer a lot more than a definition of the term anyway (which goes against Wikipedia is not a dictionary) Jayden54 22:17, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per Michaelas10. Danny Lilithborne 22:26, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete even if it isn't a neologism, it is still a dictionary definition and I don't see how it can ever be more than that. Koweja 00:42, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Just go away.  Dei zio  talk 14:40, 20 December 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.