Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Analog Circuit Design


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. W.marsh 18:15, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

Analog Circuit Design
Not notable book. Was on speedy Alex Bakharev 05:27, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Online book that does not assert notability. Michael Billington (talk • contribs) 12:41, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Sounds like a fine idea for an online book, but there is nothing shown to be there yet to justify an article.Edison 15:36, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Book sounds like it's yet to be written and WP:NOT crystal ball. Trebor 17:36, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Not notable. Hello32020 19:57, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
 * #REDIRECT Circuit design. Not exactly equivalent term but could serve as an anchor for future article. (Design of analog circuits is interesting topic and I am suprised nothing is on WP yet.) Pavel Vozenilek 23:58, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - The article should be made after the release of the book - not before. --WikiSlasher 10:03, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Not notable. Hello32020 19:57, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
 * #REDIRECT Circuit design. Not exactly equivalent term but could serve as an anchor for future article. (Design of analog circuits is interesting topic and I am suprised nothing is on WP yet.) Pavel Vozenilek 23:58, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - The article should be made after the release of the book - not before. --WikiSlasher 10:03, 3 November 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.