Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anametrix


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 20:11, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

Anametrix

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This company is not the subject of substantial coverage by multiple reliable sources, and fails WP:GNG. The coverage I found was either unsubstantial or obviously based on press releases; PR is rarely reliable, and it's never a basis of notability. Finally, WP:CORPDEPTH is wholly lacking when only reliable sources are considered. JFHJr (㊟) 17:10, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- Cheers,  Riley   Huntley  15:31, 15 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete - No claim or evidence of any notability and may be unambigious advertising. Also press releases are never reliable sources and should be removed if used as references. Holyfield1998 (talk) 21:10, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cheers, Riley   Huntley  02:29, 21 November 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Go   Phightins  !  00:03, 28 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete Not a notable company. --Shorthate (talk) 00:22, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - After searching several archives, I agree with the nominator's conclusion. This three year old company is not sufficiently notable. - MrX 03:59, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.