Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anamika Mishra


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jenks24 (talk) 04:59, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

Anamika Mishra

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No evidence of any notability. Book claimed to be a best seller but no evidence that it is anything of the kind. This looks like a promo piece which fails WP:GNG  Velella  Velella Talk 08:34, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. --  Kethrus &#124;talk to me 10:35, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. --  Kethrus &#124;talk to me 10:35, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. North America1000 11:24, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete for now as there's nothing to suggest much better at this time. SwisterTwister   talk  05:14, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:45, 9 October 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 04:56, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete per nominator's rationale. No reviews in non-RS. These two RS publishers in the article have not actually reviewed her books but only interviewed her., . §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:16, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Appears to get some publicity in Indian sources, but nothing that would reach notability as an author. LaMona (talk) 05:16, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom and above editors. Dharmadhyaksha's analysis is particularly spot on.  Onel 5969  TT me 02:47, 24 October 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.