Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anand Narayanan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete per failure of WP:BIO and WP:VAIN. -- Nish kid 64 00:38, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

Anand Narayanan
Non-notable editor; fails both the WP:BIO and WP:VAIN criteria. Google shows around only 33 relevant Google results--TBC TaLk?!? 23:20, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. I think that some of those results actually refer to another person with the same name.-- Hús  ö  nd  01:59, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Obvious vanity. Author and IP have also posted contact info (cell phone, email, etc.) to this page and Anand, which I've removed. --NMChico24 02:24, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. wikipediatrix 04:08, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. —Jared Hunt September 25, 2006, 05:22 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and own research. - Richfife 05:39, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Although the difference in country might be somewhat skewing, I still don't see an editor as notable if he or she has not done anything that would make them otherwise notable. AdamBiswanger1R.I.P. Steve Irwin 13:36, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable, thoroughly ridiculous article.UberCryxic 19:24, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, fails the everything test. RFerreira 04:33, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletions.   -- Mereda 07:03, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Week Keep- How a non-notable person can become the senior editor of a reputed channel.I think he may be notable. But the contributor of the article must provide sufficient links and sources inorder to prove his notability.Adv. P. R. Bijuchandran 14:08, 29 September 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.