Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ananda (spa)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Keep.  (aeropagitica)  22:12, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

Ananda (spa)
In its current state the article is simply an advert for this spa, with even parts of the text directly copied from the website of the spa. I doubt that spa is notable enough here, as this is not a travel guide. andy 12:10, 1 March 2006 (UTC) 'This AfD is being relisted to generate a clearer consensus. Please add new discussion below this notice. Thanks!' King of Hearts | (talk) 02:25, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Perhaps it could be moved to WikiTravel? Hynca-Hooley 12:47, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delte, ad. --Ter e nce Ong 13:12, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep and rewrite so it isn't an ad. -- Reinyday, 21:56, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
 * A spa. I'll concede that its a spa visited on occasion by a handful of celebrities, however, is a single spa/health resort suitable for a Wikipedia article, considering how many hundreds of thousands of these establishments exist, and how they are all pretty much the same? I say delete. -- Saberwyn 20:23, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, notable, not the same as other spas. Kappa 12:13, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as advert, Wikipedia is not a travel guide. Roy  boy cr ash  fan  [[Image:Flag_of_Texas.svg|30px]] 02:49, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep and rewrite. Famous spa. Crypticfirefly 05:17, 7 March 2006 (UTC)  I've done a bit of rewriting myself.  I think the structure alone may be notable.  Crypticfirefly 06:03, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Cleanup. utcursch | talk 09:04, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep and cleanup. -- S iva1979 Talk to me  16:45, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep and cleanup, per above. I'll see what I can do to help. --AaronS 22:38, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep though remove any copy vio and make it NPOV, not an ad. Staxringold 23:00, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per others. Arbusto 09:12, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, very interesting and noteworthy. - XX55XX 23:34, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.