Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ananda - In the Himalayas


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus.  MBisanz  talk 02:51, 26 November 2008 (UTC)

Ananda - In the Himalayas

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non notable organization, no reliable sources, and written like an advertisement. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 21:35, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions.   —Ism schism (talk) 21:43, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.   —Ism schism (talk) 21:43, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions.   —Ism schism (talk) 21:43, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:18, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - Been reviewed by New York Times, and also featured in its article as well, seems notable enough! (Ekabhishek (talk) 04:58, 22 November 2008 (UTC))
 * Keep - find sources and expand. ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 01:34, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment Keep for what? There is no reason and specifically no notability. Also, where are the reliable sources that merit an expansion? Please do explain your comments. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 02:13, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep: some ip user had removed ref section before this Afd was added. References include RS.--GDibyendu (talk) 06:44, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete:References in itsef do not make a subject notable. Seems like any other spa or recreation centre. The article is an advertisement. --Deepak D'Souza 05:26, 19 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete per Deepak D'Souza's comments above. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 00:35, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, seems to pass WP:N but it's probably all copyright violation. Try http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%22given+the+impetus+on+health+and+rejuvenation+in+the+world%22&btnG=Google+Search&aq=f&oq= or http://doryoku.org/site/topic/715176 Juzhong (talk) 05:30, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep: Mention by The Telegraph and NY Times prove the luxury spa is notable. -- Redtigerxyz Talk 13:08, 25 November 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.