Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anant Kapoor


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 03:23, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

Anant Kapoor

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

While there is a claim of fame, I can't find sources in a good faith gsearch to back this up. Also a search of the website given as a reference turns up 0 hits, and a gnews search turns up 0 hits for this Anant Kapoor. Because this is 12 years ago, dead tree sources in India may exist showing notability, so bringing to AfD instead of prodding. Fabrictramp |  talk to me  19:29, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  19:29, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions.  --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  19:30, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete The article claims that he isrecognized for his numerous achievements but does not say what. Google does not return any references. If his awards were notable, he should have thrown up at least one entry. Delete for now. --Deepak D'Souza 12:29, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete I could find no dead-tree references by doing a Lexis news search for "Anan! w/2 Kap**r" and "Anan! w/2 Kap*r" Agradman (talk) 14:38, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Lack of verifiability and lack of any sourced indication of notability. ChildofMidnight (talk) 19:14, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as unverifiable. The assertions of notability are so vague that they are useless for establishing anything, and escpeially useless as a way of narrowing the search.  Based on the searches therough Google, there's no evidence that offline sources will be able to yield any more information. -- Whpq (talk) 13:22, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete The current article content is too nebulous to verify and clarify, despite good-faith efforts by several editors. Abecedare (talk) 02:37, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.