Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anant Sharma


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (WP:Non-admin closure) §§ Dharmadhyaksha §§ {T/C} 04:04, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

Anant Sharma

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Changing this from a db-spam tag - does not seem to be an overtly promotional page, but I can see an argument for notability  CaroleHenson  ( talk ) 21:39, 19 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete.I would suggest the page to be deleted as it does not meet any wikipedia notability criteria or be merged to List of Governors of Punjab (India). The person has been governor for few months as to wiki table shown on List of Governors of Punjab (India) and there could be very few significant work he could have done to be noted on wikipedia. Daan0001 (talk) 22:00, 19 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Strong keep, clearly notable, based on the fact he was an elected member of Parliament and a national government minister. Sionk (talk) 03:52, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Strong keep Governors of the states of India are by definition notable. Members of the Parliament of India are by definition notable. Members of the Cabinet are even more notable. Just because the article is not as well written as it could be does not mean this person is anything less than very notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:56, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep Based upon the comments, I agree.-- CaroleHenson  ( talk ) 08:13, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep. Clearly notable per WP:POLITICIAN. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:40, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 13:40, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 13:40, 20 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep. The subject was a minister in the Government of India. Clearly passes WP:POLITICIAN. Salih  ( talk ) 17:30, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep It seems this is a great case for a speedy keep. So, I'll remove the tag and notate the article per WP:Speedy keep.-- CaroleHenson  ( talk ) 21:41, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Just say you're withdrawing your nomination and I'm sure an admin will pass by shortly to close it (after all, you've !voted twice to keep it, haha). Sionk (talk) 21:58, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes, it's a withdrawal.-- CaroleHenson  ( talk ) 01:24, 21 February 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.