Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anantara Dhigu


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:23, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

Anantara Dhigu

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

One of serveral advertisements created by Keen Media Eeekster (talk) 00:33, 4 April 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget  00:20, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Maldives-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:05, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:05, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:38, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Second relist rationale. I don't like double relisting non-BLPs but this article does look like an advertisement so I think a little more discussion is needed. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:41, 18 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete: It reads like an advertising brochure to me -- Boing!   said Zebedee  03:42, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete (weak): It sure does look far more like a brochure/blurb than an encyclopedia article.  OTOH, it HAS been covered by several travel writers, as listed in the article, so might actually qualify as 'notable', although the content/style would have to be fixed.  OT3H, travel writers are notorious for producing what amounts to blurbs themselves, and may not fall under the necessary 'significant' or 'serious' coverage (I forget the terminology we use).  OT4H, if we rule out travelogues, it'd be very difficult for any vacation venue to be 'notable'.  So I don't end up with a firm opinion at all.  David V Houston (talk) 12:37, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.