Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anantbodh Chaitanya


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mojo Hand (talk) 16:56, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

Anantbodh Chaitanya

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Does not pass WP:GNG. Has passing mentions and two short interviews about a cultural promotion in Lithuania he was associated with. No sources indicating that he's a notable spiritual teacher or author. – Thjarkur (talk) 23:32, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. – Thjarkur (talk) 23:32, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. – Thjarkur (talk) 23:32, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete: fails WP:NARTIST as well as WP:BIO. Lacks significant coverage in reliable media.  Walrus Ji (talk) 19:28, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 04:18, 20 January 2021 (UTC) Kindly keep this article on Wikipedia. Anantbodh Chaitanya is a notable person. He is a Prominent disciple of Acharya Mahamandaleshwar of Mahanirvani Akhara Swami Vishwadevanand Puri. He belongs to an Authauntic Monk Tradition of India. He is a founder trustee of Drishti Foundation affiliated with United Nations. In Malta he spoke on Frux channel on Mudras you can see here interview. . In Lithuania also some news article mention about him and his works. . You already mentioned few articles where he promoting Vedic culture. You can see his published paper also on the internet about Ancient Hindu Based Education System. https://www.academia.edu/6775974/Ancient_Hindu_Based_Education_System. There are a lot of articles what mentions about him on the internet. Thanks. Deimantas — Preceding unsigned comment added by Deimantas007 (talk • contribs) 09:43, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Please don’t delete his Wikipedia page, I learned lots of him through this page. Sat — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:8004:2781:32E5:892C:3224:34ED:A8B6 (talk) 08:59, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
 * This page is quite informative I have been following him since a long time — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2402:3A80:96F:FA2F:A89A:3B6A:E7F0:2979 (talk) 14:54, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
 * You can continue reading about him from his website. Not everyone can have an article on Wikipedia. See the criteria for having a wikipedia article on WP:BIO Walrus Ji (talk) 10:36, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Only passing mentions in some independent media. No wide coverage found.-- Redtigerxyz Talk 10:28, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
 * , the issue here is that this person has not done anything remarkable to have an article. You can read the criteria here on the link WP:BIO. Please read my above comment. Walrus Ji (talk) 18:22, 25 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete I don't think there is significant coverage on this person. Although it's well written you should consider moving it to a draft and improving on sources etc UpcomingPurseTalkToMe 17:38, 26 January 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.