Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anarchocrapitalism

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete. Smoddy (Rabbit and pork) 22:03, 3 May 2005 (UTC)

Anarchocrapitalism
Neologism gets no google hits. I'd say redirect, but nobody uses this and it's pejorative. Meelar (talk) 03:09, Apr 27, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, not notable, neologism. Megan1967 06:21, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. nn. --Viriditas  | Talk 07:30, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete not notable Dsmdgold 15:29, Apr 27, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Why are we wasting our time with this shit? Firebug 18:41, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Anarchocruftism. -- 8^D  gab 14:42, 2005 Apr 28 (UTC)
 * I've gone ahead and deleted this, because LevelCheck is trolling and all this is doing is creating extra work for people. The arbcom looks as though it's going to accept a case against him, so hopefully it won't go on for much longer. If anyone (other than LevelCheck) disagrees with me about this deletion, let me know and I'll undelete. SlimVirgin (talk) 01:06, Apr 30, 2005 (UTC)
 * It has been reposted. We have policies for a reason, you can't just go around deleting anything you feel like. LevelCheck 01:17, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. I put it on speedy delete, but someone else removed it.  Anyway, this page was only created to harass a specific user (see page's first version); why keep it for any length of time? A2Kafir 14:03, 1 May 2005 (UTC)


 * This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.