Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anarho-sindikalisticka inicijativa


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Mango juice talk 05:33, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

Anarho-sindikalisticka inicijativa
Not notable per WP:ORG, but that's only a proposal.

Small Serbian traditionalist or nationalist anarchist group. A couple of thousand hits on Google, mostly statements on activist sites. Website:, photos:. This pretty much sums it up:

''Radical liberals, nongovernmental organisation and para-libertarian organizations started their pale, dumb and stupid pacifistic campaign for bourgeoisie peace. Peace, peace, they are screaming like crows. Peace they say, while not understanding that the peace is only achievable by war. Class war, which will destroy those ones who are exploiting, terrorizing and dehumanizing whole world population.''

[removed edit] -- Steve Hart 01:21, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, not notable. Gazpacho 00:04, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

Un1v4C: ASI is not a nationalist organisation! I don't see a reason for erasing that article.


 *  AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.  Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Mailer Diablo 18:05, 15 August 2006 (UTC)


 * ASI appears to be a small political organisation formed in 2003 which is local in scope. 49,000Ghits, many of which are kontrapunkt.info or other anarchist groups, and appears to fail WP:ORG. Little information is available on this grouping, as sites seem only to acknowledge existence of the org and point to their website. It has 97 incoming links, most of which are either internal, from kontrapunkt.info or other anarchist groups. It has apparently engaged in protests agains the Canadian embassy against the G8 summit, publicised (I suspect) by its own press release. Also unfortunate victim of systematic bias, but the number of Ghits would appear not to confirm its notability. delete Ohconfucius 04:15, 18 August 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.