Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anastagia Pierre


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. clear consensus  DGG ( talk ) 08:17, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

Anastagia Pierre

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Subject has won a lot of titles and appeared on a reality tv show, but there is no evidence (in the article or through extensive google searches) of significant coverage in reliable third party sources. There are a lot of hits but they are mainly fluff pieces about her meeting Prince Harry in a one-off encounter and I can't see how that contributes to notability. Bahamas Weekly articles seem largely to have been provided by the Miss Bahamas Organization and thus can't be considered independent. --- PageantUpdater (talk) 00:56, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 01:28, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 01:29, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Beauty pageants-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 01:29, 13 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete -- unremarkable pageant contestant. Per prior outcomes, such articles are routinely deleted. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:29, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep There are several independent sources with significant coverage The Cayman Reporter, Breaking Travel News (where she co-hosted the World Travel Awards), IMDb (appeared in HBO "Ballers"); and the fact that it was a published story in major news outlets in regards to Prince Harry, thus WP:GNG is met, so the more specific notability guidelines don't matter. The Miss America Bahamas and newspapers of the Bahamas are too separate entitles as well and are third-parties; similar to articles written in the Cayman Islands, which is a separate geographical entity. Nom admits that "she has has won a lot of titles and appeared on a reality tv show", furthering GNG. Savvyjack23 (talk) 21:52, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry but those claims to evidence of notability are laughable. The Cayman Reporter article is about someone else entirely and simply name drops Pierre as a trainer.  Ditto the Breaking Travel News (also not a reliable source) - being name dropped as a host of an event is not significant coverage nor does hosting that event make her notable.   The Prince Harry thing is WP:BLP1E if ever I saw a more perfect example of it.  IMDB is not a source that can establish notability.  If the articles in the Bahamas news are simply entries provided by the Miss Bahamas Org rather than actual news they cannot be considered independent either.  Lots of people win pageant titles and appear on reality tv shows, and as K.e.coffman says, they are routinely deleted or redirected. --- PageantUpdater (talk) 00:31, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ad Orientem (talk) 23:58, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete -- Not notable (did not place in Miss Universe pageant). She failed to meet WP:GNG.--Richie Campbell (talk) 17:11, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete a non-notable perennial Beauty pageant contestant who never reached a level of notability. Name dropping is not the same as significant coverage.John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:17, 27 June 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.