Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anastasia 'Nat' Tubanos


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Black Kite (t) (c) 00:43, 24 June 2011 (UTC)

Anastasia 'Nat' Tubanos

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Not a notable person per WP:BIO. The article has only primary sources, or secondary sources with self-published material. The only real secondary source I found was this, which reports on all things Greek-Canadian. I wouldn't say it's a very good source. Also, see Articles for deletion/Anastasia Tubanos. It appears this article, with the nickname added, was created to prevent it from getting summarily deleted for recreation. Like all articles concerning Matt Campagna and company (this is his girlfriend or something), who in the past has frequently used Wikipedia as a vehicle for free advertisement and continues to do so, this article was created and almost solely edited by themselves. Atlan (talk) 11:24, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  — -- Cirt (talk) 19:29, 6 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Stronger than Weak Keep. Meets WP:GNG. Is also listed on IMDb as an actress. She also hosts a program on television (i.e. not just broadcasting on the web).  Nipson anomhmata   (Talk) 21:05, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Meh. I agree that you have improved the article somewhat by adding the source I suggested above. Ironic that it requires a listing at Afd for a Greek to swoop down and work on the article. However, it still fails WP:BIO and WP:GNG with those weak references. What is there is certainly not "significant independent coverage". With Tubanos' pervasive self-publishing on Canadian websites, it's hard to tell if the vanity piece at canada.greekreporter is actually independent. The other sources are either self-published or only tangentially relevant to the subject. Furthermore, IMDb is user-submitted and not a qualifier for notability guidelines. If nothing has changed regarding the televion show since Articles for deletion/Anastasia Tubanos, then that's still not notable. Seriously, if you need to persistently add yourself to Wikipedia everytime and no one else will do it, you likely shouldn't be on it.--Atlan (talk) 21:19, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
 * I've never revealed my ethnic identity although I do speak the Greek language. I'm not Anastasia Tubanos (or a WP:PUPPET of).  Nipson anomhmata   (Talk) 22:46, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
 * I didn't mean to imply that you were, sorry if it seemed that way. I am in fact quite certain that you are not her or even affiliated to her. If I would venture a guess, I'd say you are a Greek Cypriot. :)--Atlan (talk) 22:53, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
 * I speak French too but that doesn't mean I'm French either. You're not very good at this ethnic guessing game. Here are a bunch of articles that have been published by Anastasia Tubanos ->here<-. Almost all are technical "geek" oriented articles. Quite a list. They don't reflect notability on their own but it is another arrow in her armory.  Nipson anomhmata   (Talk) 23:20, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
 * You can be from Pluto for all I care, it's totally irrelevant. But yes, very nice. More self-published work. I already noted Tubanos' pervasive self-publishing on Canadian websites.--Atlan (talk) 23:36, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 00:57, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 00:57, 7 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete Non-notable. Google News search finds lots of stuff BY her but nothing at all ABOUT her - which is what we require for inclusion in Wikipedia. --MelanieN (talk) 21:48, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 13 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete per above. By the looks of it, quite prolific and good at her job, but there's no coverage of her from third-party sources, so she fails the WP:BIO notability criteria.  Lankiveil (speak to me) 22:15, 22 June 2011 (UTC).
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.