Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anastasia Kuznetsova


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 20:38, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

Anastasia Kuznetsova

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Okay so this is weird, but bear with me...: there are two different models named Anastasia Kuznetsova. Neither of them meet the guidelines of notability. The girl pictured here is named Anastasia Kuznetsova but is not even of the one in the models this article is ostensibly referring to. Upon further research, the reference to models.com is the correct person for this article, but unsurprisingly they have linked an interview the other Russian model Anastasia Kuznetsova at the very bottom of the page; in it, the other girl said she would love to work for Victoria's Secret yet the correct one already walked in the Victoria's Secret Fashion Show show in 2009, which the template on the Wikipedia article displays. On social media, the correct girl's Instagram is called @tomachella, linked on the Models.com profile on the righthand side, whereas the other girl's Instagram, linked in the interview, is @anastasia.kuz, which helps you see they are two different people. Not only that, these women are two different ages and their careers started at totally different times. The models.com profile lists her as signed to Women Management in Milan, but it's the other girl who is (which you can see here. While at first glance they may look alike, the correct Anastasia has a cleft chin and doesn't have green eyes or brown hair). That being said, it doesn't take an expert to surmise that neither of them meet the requirements of notability to try to rescue this article. Trillfendi (talk) 17:48, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Russia. Shellwood (talk) 17:53, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per above explanation, simply being a model isn't enough. I can't find much for sourcing for either of them, routine work-related photos and the like. Oaktree b (talk) 17:57, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:53, 12 September 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.