Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anasuya Bharadwaj


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. There is strong policy-based consensus to keep. (non-admin closure) Zing ( Talk! ) 04:54, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

Anasuya Bharadwaj

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Subject is a non-notable TV presenter. Salimfadhley (talk) 21:44, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Salimfadhley (talk) 21:44, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:10, 5 October 2020 (UTC)


 * Speedy keep. She is clearly notable as an actress. (Starred in several films, won notable awards). There is no reason to delete this article.TamilMirchi (talk) 23:33, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Did you do a WP:Before?TamilMirchi (talk) 23:33, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Invite these Telugu users to discussion.TamilMirchi (talk) 23:46, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
 * question - I confess, I am not familiar with this subject. My AfD nomination was based on the poor quality of sourcing. I could not find reliable, independent sources which significantly cover this subject. If they exist, let's add them to the article and then I can withdraw this AfD. --Salimfadhley (talk) 00:08, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Ok. Sources will be added. Kindly close the discussion.TamilMirchi (talk) 00:09, 6 October 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep She is notable... Hasan (talk) 05:25, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep Played lead role in Kathanam and significant roles in Kshanam and Rangasthalam for which they notable awards. That would satisfy WP:NACTOR. In addition, several reliable sources are added by TamilMirchi.--Ab207 (talk) 08:12, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment - if this is to be a keep, can we improve the sources on the article? My AfD nomination was based on the very poor quality of sourcing for this article. From what I can see, almost nothing that would satisfy WP:NACTOR or WP:GNG. I see comments that say she is "well known" and has appeared in notable films, so there must be some significant coverage that shows she is notable. --Salimfadhley (talk) 11:40, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
 * NACTOR reads "significant roles in multiple notable films", and she does satisfy it. Nearly all the sources in the article are reliable per WP:ICTFSOURCES. Its unclear what more is expected. --Ab207 (talk) 12:30, 6 October 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep per the others. Foxnpichu (talk) 18:11, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep article looks like it has been improved considerably (edited to add, since it was created in 2015) but meets WP:GNG Shameran81 (talk) 23:04, 12 October 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.