Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anatoly Zolotukhin


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) f  eminist  15:52, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

Anatoly Zolotukhin

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable person. Does not meet WP:PROF or WP:GNC. XXN, 21:12, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. –&#8239;Joe (talk) 09:00, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. –&#8239;Joe (talk) 09:00, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. –&#8239;Joe (talk) 09:00, 25 January 2017 (UTC)


 * ?. Fails WP:Prof: highest citation is entered twice in GS. not sure about GNG. Xxanthippe (talk).
 * Keep -- full professor for 25 years at a major institution; some of his works have been published in English: Worldcat Identities. More sources are likely to be available in Russian.
 * He is also Professor Emeritus at the University of Stavanger. So there's some international recognition as well, or perhaps sources in Norwegian. Here's an author's bio link; this looks similar to bios of notable academics. K.e.coffman (talk) 21:15, 28 January 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 05:57, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment. No article in the Russian Wikipedia that I could find. The article creator is very active there, so why no article on this Russian academic? Jack N. Stock (talk) 06:29, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep - I don't know why he doesn't have an article in the Russian Wikipedia, but we really can't consider that.  I believe he meets WP:ACADEMIC based on all his positions, papers and various prizes..  —Мандичка YO 😜 09:15, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep per . ru-wiki has a fifth of the articles we do, so the fact that they don't cover Zolotukhin (yet) is neither here nor there. –&#8239;Joe (talk) 15:21, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep Just his work with the World Petroleum Forum alone is probably enough to make him notable. I would like to see more information on him, but the sources above clearly show he is notable. I am hoping people who know Russian can paraphrase them into English so we can get a better sense of who this person is. I have come to realize that people in the hard sciences are very often notable when thought not to be. Remember people can pass other plancks of academic notability besides 1. Being a notable academic is possible by any planck, not meeting planck one does not mean the person is not a notable academic.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:32, 5 February 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.