Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ancestry of Elizabeth II


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Elizabeth II. Any sourced information can be merged based on page history. ansh 666 00:44, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

Ancestry of Elizabeth II

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Almost entirely unsourced material about a living person. All but two names at the very bottom of the article could be deleted immediately and without discussion per WP:BLP. Furthermore, the article is hardly helpful. The ahnentafel format is not understandable to an ordinary reader. I know how it works yet I struggle to read it. Elizabeth's ancestry can be explained perfectly in Elizabeth II. Surtsicna (talk) 20:03, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete way too many non-notable people on this list.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:11, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
 * It is without doubt an extremely silly format. But the way to resolve that is to add a chart (which I've done by pulling it from an old revision) and deleting the rest. I know that doesn't address the concern over sourcing, so I haven't voted keep. Celia Homeford (talk) 10:12, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Merge with Elizabeth II. AlessandroTiandelli333 (talk) 11:16, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete. Per nomination, plus probably original research. ——Chalk19 (talk) 07:10, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Partial Merge to Elizabeth II. The chart going back 5 generations should be enough. power~enwiki ( π,  ν ) 22:16, 18 February 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.