Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ancient technology in Stargate


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 09:55, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

Ancient technology in Stargate

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Completely un-referenced original research and synthesis. The provided references are to Wikipedia itself. No viable third-party references are forthcoming, so this piece should be removed as its subject matter is non-notable and therefore the title is not salvageable. Mikeblas (talk) 12:06, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. It's entirely possible that something like this could be written.  However, this article is just a huge collection of poorly-sourced cruft that belongs on Wikia.  I found a few promising sources on Google Books: Stepping Through The Stargate (BenBella Books), The Essential Science Fiction Television Reader (University Press of Kentucky), The Postmodern Sacred (McFarland & Company), and Science Fiction Television Series, 1990-2004 (McFarland).  However, the article would need to be rewritten from scratch, and this stuff could probably be briefly summarized somewhere else, like Ancient (Stargate). NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:54, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. As much as I loves me some Stargate, the ratio of six (potentially) reliable secondary sources to 73 primary sources is plainly unacceptable.  As it is, this article consists almost entirely of plot and falls well short of meeting the notability guideline.  Kudos to NinjaRobotPirate for even finding as many sources as he did.  —   fourthords  &#124; =Λ= &#124;  21:22, 20 June 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.