Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ancillary IPs


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 00:52, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

Ancillary IPs

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Neologism. Only 21 unique Ghits, so not a term that's taken off. eaolson (talk) 00:04, 17 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep. This is a term that is only two years old. It has been published on two occasions and is being prepared for a third publication (all at an industry standard).  It is a term that is used in the media arts in Australia and has come from research undertaken by the Australian Network for Art and Technology, the key organisation for Australia with regard to arts/science collaborations.  The terms is growing with greater interest from the University research and government arts bodies.  The term has been presented at the 3rd Annual IP in Management Practice Conference, Media Arts Congress and will be presented at ISEA 2009.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Contrabass001 (talk • contribs) 00:35, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment. If that's true, the fact that the term is still being "presented to" (whatever that means) the community for which it actually is jargon suggests that it hasn't even reached the level of a neologism. eaolson (talk) 02:39, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Does not yet seem to have reached wide currency. Delete as neologism: article can always be recreated if/when term is in wider use. -- The Anome (talk) 00:08, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete also per WP:NEO and unless sources other than from Mr Artz are to be found Corpx (talk) 20:59, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.