Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ancrum Road Primary School


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was merge and redirect to Dundee. Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 06:00, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

Ancrum Road Primary School

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable, no sources provided. Seinfreak37 21:13, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, speedy if you accept that it counts as a non notable group of people. Wikipedia is not a directory. J Milburn 21:16, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
 * comment Given that it's not an article it's a sentence, I couldn't care less if it stays or goes, however aren't primary schools theoretically supposed to be merged with local education authority area according to WIKI:SCHOOLS (which, yes, I know, is not official policy yaddayaddayadda....) Jcuk 22:55, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Note that WP:SCHOOLS not being policy is actually very important for the purpose of this debate, not merely yada-yada. » K i G O E  | talk  05:17, 19 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep but definitely expand. One sentence is not sufficient, and it almost doesn't matter if the article exists. However, it has the potential to be helpful. » K i G O E  | talk  05:15, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Notability neither asserted nor demonstrated, and there are no references/sources. WMMartin 13:43, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect to Dundee per WP:LOCAL. The school guidelines suggest the same but are not approved yet.  Yamaguchi先生 02:32, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge per Yamaguchi. --Myles Long 15:58, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect to Dundee per Yamaguchi, this inspection report concretely verifies that it exists and provides additional useful information. (jarbarf) 16:34, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge; an education in Dundee article would likely be the best target. Christopher Parham (talk) 04:58, 23 February 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.