Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/And There Was Light


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar ⨹   15:01, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

And There Was Light

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:NBOOK; and besides, this article doesn't even discuss the book that is its topic (outside of some praise), but covers the book's topic instead. Q VVERTYVS (hm?) 17:08, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:24, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:24, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

Speedy delete: Article exists solely to promote. --Mr. Guye (talk) 01:35, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. The book doesn't appear to be notable enough to warrant an entry and this is so unambiguously promotional and so filled with peacock phrasing that it would be speedyable on that criteria alone. I just can't find any in-depth coverage of this book. It's listed as a resource in a handful of books, but nowhere near enough to where it'd pass NBOOK. At the most this could probably be listed in a "further reading" section in the main article for Atlantic Union College, but there's no real need for this to be otherwise mentioned in that article and it makes little sense for this to re-direct. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   07:31, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
 * It's been added for to a new FR section. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   07:33, 4 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete I declined to speedy delete it via G11. It is not promotional for the book. To some extent it is promotional for the college, but removing a few words would fix that. But the book is not notable. It is not even in WorldCat, which is a minimum requirement for a US publication. The author, has written no other books: world cat shows only a short journal article and a  phd thesis  DGG ( talk ) 15:25, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.