Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/And that's the news!


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 14:11, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

And that's the news!
Non-notable, unsourced, phrase is so generic that google searches are inconclusive. Possible candidate for redirect, but I don't know where to. Jdcooper 17:07, 13 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Jdcooper 17:07, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. This article serves no purpose whatsoever. Feeeshboy 17:33, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge and delete if an appropriate article can be found; else just Delete. Valrith 21:08, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - it's a stub of an article that cannot grow, and has no sources. -- Whpq 21:15, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete —  No I think its a good idea. We could also have, "and now for the weather" "and here's Jill with sport" and... not. Delete :) - Gl e n 21:36, 13 August 2006 (UTC) - Gl e n 21:36, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, WP:NOT a repository for every single phrase used everywhere. -- Kinu t /c  22:03, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. and that's all. WP:NOT :) Dlohcierekim 08:14, 15 August 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.