Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/And the Winner Isn't...


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was And the Winner Isn't .... consensus to do anything beside delete this article. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  13:15, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

And the Winner Isn't...

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Pretty much exactly the same as And The Winner Isn't and contains a single source. Hollywood98 and ACMM98 semms to be the same person with WP:COI ArcticDragonfly (talk) 15:35, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2017 August 6.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 15:46, 6 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Redirect to And The Winner Isn't. It seems to be an alternative name. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TetraNomic (talk • contribs) 15:52, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:31, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Agree because actually that "alt" name is proper per WP:NCF.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 06:34, 7 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete. The film has not been discussed in enough significant depth by reliable sources. Binksternet (talk) 18:31, 7 August 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.