Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andagoya


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. postdlf (talk) 06:50, 23 December 2012 (UTC)

Andagoya

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Appears to be a non-notable village per WP:GEOLAND but what I really don't like about the article it that the village is described as having the "chief claim to fame is its spectacularly monotonous climate" and "...being monotonously hot, Andagoya is also monotonously wet...". These disparaging opinions (is it unreferenced) has been here since March 2004! -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 23:23, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Colombia-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 22:29, 18 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Obvious and speedy keep The nominator has violated the deletion policy by failing to read and do what's required per WP:BEFORE. A source for the existence of this village was so easily findable that anyone who cared and did some investigating before nominating would have found it. I can only assume he didn't bother. As to the content of the article - it's miserable, but miserable content is never an excuse for deletion; it's an invitation to improve the article; read WP:BEFORE. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 00:01, 19 December 2012 (UTC)


 * I will reiterate: [it] appears to be a non-notable village per Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 04:35, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
 * All villages are notable; if you read WP:OUTCOMES as you claim to have (following WP:BEFORE), you'd have known that your nomination is disruptive and cannot succeed. I suggest you withdraw it. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 06:45, 19 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep. The nominator appears not to have read even the first sentence of the guideline section that he cites, which is clear that size is not a determiner of notability of a community. Phil Bridger (talk) 20:23, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Snow keep – Per Wikipedia's Five pillars, the encyclopedia also exists as a gazetteer; also keep per Notability (geography) and per WP:MAPOUTCOMES. Northamerica1000(talk) 14:40, 21 December 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.