Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andazification


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. X clamation point  01:04, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

Andazification

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Band article which does not provide evidence of their notability. Fails WP:BAND. Astronaut (talk) 15:45, 24 March 2009 (UTC) *Delete, article does not even try o establish notability. Deletion Mutation 15:49, 28 March 2009 (UTC)  N.B. !vote of sockpuppet of blocked user struck through. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:37, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  -- &mdash; LinguistAtLarge • Talk  17:25, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. I find no criteria in WP:Music that this band meets.  5000+ ghits, but I find no individual independent reliable coverage of this band.  Delete unless evidence of notability is established.  ♫ Cricket02 (talk) 00:05, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: insufficient independent 3rd party coverage. JamesBurns (talk) 02:05, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable band. Fails WP:MUSIC. Gogo Dodo (talk) 08:25, 28 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.