Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anders Engbergs


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus.  MBisanz  talk 03:02, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

Anders Engbergs

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Tagged as unreferenced since 2006, reliable sources turned up with a Google search of "Anders Engbergs" show it as part of the phrase "Lotta & Anders Engbergs" (an earlier ensemble whose Wikipedia article has similarly been tagged since 2006 as needing sources - but at least they won a Grammis award). The article asserts a few charting recordings, but no indication of the level of success as needed per WP:MUSIC. A recent AfD resulted in the deletion of the article of the bandleader, and there is even less here than in the deleted article. B.Wind (talk) 16:57, 15 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep. Definitely notable. Has an iw link to Swedish article, existing uncontested since 2006, and with (Swedish-language) sources. Tomas e (talk) 16:50, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
 * You may want to check the logs on this one. Anders Engbergs was deleted in 2007. This is a recreation of that article. B.Wind (talk) 03:14, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Tomas was referring to the Swedish article. - Mgm|(talk) 10:39, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I wasn't. B.Wind (talk) 03:19, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I don't understand why and how a deletion two years ago, where I did not particpate in the assessment of notability, should have any effect on my judgment as to the notability of the subject. I make my judgment based on the article and the subject. And I must say that I find the habit of some editors of commenting on other people's "votes" to be tiresome. If you don't demonstrate a familitary with the subject and, in this case, Swedish-language sources in addition to English-language ones, you are not very likely to change my opinion. Tomas e (talk) 11:38, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Of course I notice no mention of the AfD and deletion from last week (see nom).... B.Wind (talk) 17:28, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.   --  fr33k  man   -s-  15:39, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions.   --  fr33k  man   -s-  15:40, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: not demonstrating significant independent notability WP:BAND. JamesBurns (talk) 05:32, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:22, 20 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Neutral. This article is about a band named like a person and a band has apparently had some hits in some Swedish top list. However, none of this is sourced and the previous deletion makes me wonder. Admiral Norton (talk) 14:57, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Simply needs some more references. Notable enough to warrant an article. ☺    Spiby    ☻  14:50, 21 February 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.