Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anders Fogleman


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was  d elete. - Mailer Diablo 06:23, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Anders Fogleman

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Appears to be autobiographical. Notability not established. Sources not provided. "Anders Fogleman" returns < 20 ghits. Prod removed (kind of) by original author. --OnoremDil 15:41, 30 April 2007 (UTC) Comment would you please list a few examples of possible sources?
 * Delete fails notability by a long shot, and WP:COI as well. Sources from Facebook and YouTube and a claim that "This person is notable to many college-aged people" don't help. Hut 8.5 16:20, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment Some notabilities are proven through a source. If you would like a list of people who have watched videos and know him, I'm sure you could ask around. But there is no document saying he is officially notable. - Comment moved here from article by --OnoremDil 16:44, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment Mere existence is not the same thing as notability. There are many people who have seen my neighbour's videos, but that doesn't mean a thing. Wikipedia policy requires attribution to verifiable, reliable, independent, non-trivial sources. Most people (including you and I) are trivial sources. A reviewer for the New York Times or the Globe and Mail would be non-trivial. -- Charlene 17:00, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Without any external sources, this is just another YouTube video uploader. &mdash; Scientizzle 16:45, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete One out of thousands of YouTube video uploaders. No attribution to non-trivial, independent, reliable sources. -- Charlene 17:00, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Anything that satisfies WP:RS will do. Hut 8.5 18:37, 2 May 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.