Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ando Tammik


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete ck lostsword•T•C 12:10, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Ando Tammik

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

An anon tagged it for speedy deletion, but he worked on a lot of movies and there are some external links so A7 does not really apply. However, I can find no evidence that he is notable, just a few sites (Yahoo, New York Times, IMDB) that give lists of movies he worked on. Mr.Z-man  talk ¢ 16:19, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Provides no references to establish notability in his field. As for WP:BIO for creative professionals: not a significant figure, did not innovate, played no significant role (only a minor one) in a major production, is not critically acclaimed. Tdmg 02:12, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment May be notable ¿SFGi Д nts!  ¿Complain! ¿Analyze! ¿Review! 21:14, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Apparently nn. ¿SFGi Д nts!  ¿Complain! ¿Analyze! ¿Review! 21:15, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletions.   -- John Vandenberg 14:00, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Being one of a handful of animators on two or three popular movies doesn't make you notable--Ispy1981 21:48, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.